Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in

Judges' Tips


  • Get your point across quickly and simply – remember judges review lots of entries
  • Be authentic – retrospectively constructed objectives are easy to spot
  • Write every entry against the specific criteria for the individual category you are entering
  • Show a clear link between strategy, objectives, tactics and outcomes
  • Show evidence of a strong strategy – don’t make assumptions
  • Use simple explanations and clear, punchy language
  • Explain what you wanted to achieve and why – we need to know the problem, not just the solution
  • Say why you approached the problem in this way – what were the critical success factors and were there any difficult circumstances to overcome at the time of execution?
  • Be careful regarding statement of commercial objectives with educationally accredited programmes. If you enter a CME or CPD programme the judges will be watching for any commercial bias and for compliance with recognised guidelines
  • State what gave your campaign the competitive edge and if the proposed solution was innovative
  • State if this campaign was the first of its kind
  • Ensure the evaluation and outcomes really do marry up with the SMART objectives you set out to achieve
  • Tell us how and where the results made a difference for the audience and the client
  • Identify who did what between client and agency – roles and responsibilities
  • Remember – judges are looking for entries that make them think “I wish I had thought of that” or “That’s an initiative/activity I would have been proud to be associated with”
  • Make sure that all materials supplied can be viewed in both Mac and PC format, that you provide any passwords required and that links to sites remain valid until after the final judging day (24 May 2018).


  • Exceed the submission length limit – a 200-word executive summary (supplied as a separate document) and two additional pages of A4 (minimum font size 10)
  • Be afraid to show what the initiative or activity looked like – a picture says a thousand words
  • Be too formulaic – creativity is very important and remember less is often more
  • Use complex sentences and ‘clever’ words
  • Overuse marketing jargon
  • Overstate your initiative – if it was a meeting series, say so
  • Make apologies for using a standard tactic; explain that it was precisely what was required – flawlessly executed, of course
  • Confuse “outtakes”, “outputs”, and “outcomes” when evaluating effectiveness of the campaign
  • Assume the judges know the ins and outs of your disease/therapy area – ensure you explain enough to help them understand, but not so much as to complicate the entry
  • Assume the judges will get to see your materials on the day – if your entry doesn’t make the cut on the first round of scoring, they won’t see any additional items that you send in. If an innovative tactic was involved, make sure it is represented or depicted properly in the submission itself.

Final Tip

Once you have written your entry, let a colleague who knows nothing about the initiative read it. If they don’t understand something, then neither will the judges!

“I have participated in the Communiqué Awards over the last 20 years as a keen young agency team member submitting entries, a leader of a network agency mobilising award success to drive our brand, a judge working through the robust and transparent judging process and most recently as my own agency won Small Consultancy of the Year for 2017. This ongoing commitment is based on knowing that these awards genuinely reward and drive best practice in our industry, constantly update themselves to remain relevant and their high credibility provides a great platform for raising our profile.”
Jeremy Clark,
Managing Director, Clark Health Communications


Behind the Judging: Communiqué Awards

Behind the Judging: Communiqué Awards
Find out what the chair of judges Anna Korving, senior judges Sarah Matthew and Annabelle Sandeman and previous award winners Paul Tanner, 90TEN and Emma Reynolds, Cohn & Wolfe; have to say on how the judging process works, what the judges focus on, tips on what helps and what distracts within an entry and get insights into how previous winners have created that stand out submission.