Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in
Email:
Password:

Aventis pays USD 182.8m in Anzamet fraud case

On 10 September, Aventis agreed to settle False Claims Act allegations concerning its pricing and marketing of Anzemet, an anti-emetic used alongside cancer therapies

On 10 September, French pharmaceutical company Aventis Pharmaceuticals (now sanofi-aventis) agreed to settle False Claims Act allegations concerning its pricing and marketing of Anzemet (dolasetron), an anti-emetic drug used alongside cancer therapies.

The settlement relates to government claims that Aventis artificially inflated the average wholesale price (AWP) for Anzemet, which then increased the cost of government reimbursements for the drug.

As a result, Aventis racked up more profits than it would normally have through an artificially high difference between the reimbursement rate given by federal healthcare programmes and the actual price paid by healthcare providers. The company has not admitted any wrong-doing in the matter.

The company's US pharmaceutical subsidiary has, however, entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Aventis paid a civil settlement of USD 182.8m (plus interest) which included USD 172.6m to the US government to resolve all federal claims for civil damages and a USD 10.2m fund for states wanting to resolve any alleged Medicaid over-payment claims.

The suit was brought against Aventis by Ven-A-Care, a US-based home infusion company, which will receive a USD 32m share of the settlement.

Assistant Attorney General Peter D Keisler said of the case: "The Justice Department will continue to hold drug companies accountable for fraudulent pricing schemes designed to give windfalls to drug companies and doctors at the expense of federal healthcare programmes for the poor and elderly."

Critics in the pharmaceutical industry say that by allowing Medicare and federal government to set drug prices, both entities are effectively engaged in setting price controls on pharmaceuticals. In reality, the critics add, the current system only serves to increase drug prices at the expense of all, except the federal government.

30th September 2008

Share

COVID-19 Updates and Daily News

Featured jobs

PMHub

Add my company
Langland

Langland, a Publicis Health company, is the only health communications agency that thinks further across Clinical Trial Experience, Medical Strategy...

Latest intelligence

PME-MAY21-Cover
Avoiding A Series of Unfortunate Events: launch lessons from lockdown
Chris Ross takes a novel look at launch excellence through the lens of COVID-19 and explores how pharma’s launch leaders are rewriting the story...
6 reasons patients drop out of clinical trials and 6 ways to fix it
If you’ve successfully recruited patients for your clinical trial, but one by one, they begin to drop out, then this information could be for you....
Sharing patient stories for World Pulmonary Hypertension Day
For World Pulmonary Hypertension Day and we’re here to help raise awareness of pulmonary hypertension (PH) - a frequently under and misdiagnosed condition. Created in collaboration with the PH patient...