Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in
Email:
Password:

Boehringer pays $95m to settle illegal marketing claims

Former sales rep whistleblower receives $17m from US federal government

Boehringer Ingelheim has agreed to pay $95m to settle claims it marketed several drugs in the US for unapproved uses.

The US Department of Justice said that the German pharma company had been involved in the “improper promotion" of the stroke-prevention drug Aggrenox, the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) drugs Atrovent and Combivent, and the hypertension drug Micardis.

These allegations stemmed from former Boehringer sales rep, Robert Heiden, who will receive more than $17m under the provisions of the False Claims Act for acting as a whistleblower.

This money comes from the $78.5m Boehringer is to pay the federal government, from which state Medicaid programmes will receive $16.5m.

Heiden called out Boehringer for promoting Aggrenox for cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and peripheral vascular disease, neither of which are part of the drug's approved marketing indications from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

In addition, Boehringer is also said to have marketed Combivent for use prior to another bronchodilator in treating COPD, and promoted Micardis for the treatment of early kidney disease in people with diabetes.

As well as these claims of improper marketing of drugs in unapproved uses, the Department of Justice said Boehringer “knowingly promoted the sale and use of Combivent and Atrovent at doses that exceeded those covered by federal health care programmes and that Boehringer knowingly made unsubstantiated claims about the efficacy of Aggrenox, including that it was superior to Plavix”.

On top of all this, the settlement also resolves allegations that Boehringer paid kickbacks to physicians to encourage the prescribing of all the mentioned drugs.

“The improper promotion of pharmaceuticals undermines the FDA's important role in protecting the American public by determining whether a drug is safe and effective for a particular use before it is marketed,” said Stuart Delery, acting assistant attorney general for the civil division of the Department of Justice.

“This civil settlement by Boehringer demonstrates that such conduct will not be tolerated.”

Boehringer told Reuters the decision to settle was not an admission liability, but was made “to resolve this matter in order to avoid the time and expense of continuing litigation”.

As well as the $95m settlement, Boehringer has also agreed to enter a 'corporate integrity agreement' overseen by the Departmenrt of Justice. This will ensure procedures and reviews are implemented within Boehringer to both avoid and detect similar improper marketing conduct in the future.

26th October 2012

From: Sales

Share

Tags

Featured jobs

Subscribe to our email news alerts

PMHub

Add my company
Porterhouse Medical Group

The Porterhouse Medical Group provides market research, insights, and scientific and medical communication services to the pharmaceutical industry across the...

Latest intelligence

World Pancreatic Cancer Day 2018: Combating misconceptions in pancreatic cancer
Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer face a dismal prognosis, with the disease having the lowest survival rate of all major cancers. In spite of this, pancreatic cancer research is chronically...
World Diabetes Day: Interaction and impact of diabetes on mental health
For World Diabetes Day on the 14th November 2018, Nisha Shahrukh - Medical Writer at Mednet Group has written an article depicting the impact diabetes has on mental health. Including...
EU
Innovation in merger control and the impact on the pharmaceutical sector
Is focusing on pipeline products enough to assess regulatory risks?...

Infographics