Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in
Email:
Password:

Canadian Avandia study restates cardio risk in elderly

A new Canadian study reveals that older patients who take GSK's diabetes pill Avandia have a higher risk of heart attacks, congestive heart failure and death

According to a new Canadian study, older patients who took GlaxoSmithKline's (GSK) type II diabetes pill Avandia (roseglitazone) had a higher risk of heart attacks, congestive heart failure and death than those on other diabetes treatments.

The study of 160,000 patients conducted by researchers at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science followed subjects aged over 65 years for four years. Older patients were not represented well in previous studies, according to study head, Dr Lorraine Lipscombe, an endocrinologist and researcher at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science.

The study, which was funded by the Ontario government and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), examined how older patients responded to Avandia or Japanese-headquartered Takeda's Actos (pioglitazone), compared with those on other diabetes treatments.

The US labelling for Avandia and Actos have carried a "black box" warning against their use in patients with advanced congestive heart failure. The Canadian study found Avandia raised heart failure risk even in patients with no history of the condition, suggesting the heart failure warning was inadequate.

Approximately eight per cent of patients were hospitalised for congestive heart failure or a heart attack during the study. Compared with patients on other diabetes treatments, those on only Avandia or Actos had a 60 per cent higher risk of congestive heart failure and a 40 per cent higher heart attack risk. They also had a 29 per cent higher risk of death.

According to Dr Lipscombe, the increased heart risks observed in the Avandia/Actos group were predominantly in patients taking Avandia. She stated that the results did not indicate that Actos was safer, but that the study might have enrolled fewer Actos patients to detect a higher risk.

In a statement to the US media, a spokeswoman for GSK said the problems with the study were obvious with regard to the CHF (congestive heart failure) findings. Avandia and Actos had well-documented and similar CHF events, yet this study somehow finds an increase in these events with Avandia compared with Actos, she added.

Steven Nissen, the Cleveland Clinic's chief of cardiovascular surgery, who initially raised concerns in his own investigation, said the Canadian study was independent, not funded by industry and had a huge sample size, adding it was real-life data.

The FDA has asked GSK to compare Avandia's heart attack risk with those of other diabetes treatments, but the trial itself is not expected to complete until March 2014.

12th December 2007

Share

COVID-19 Updates and Daily News

Featured jobs

PMHub

Add my company
Havas Life Medicom

We’re a specialist-led, unified communications agency delivering connected healthcare communications, informed through fresh insights, smart thinking and inspired ideas. Our...

Latest intelligence

Top 10 ways to leverage the Impetus InSite Platform® to (virtually) launch your brand
The Impetus InSite Platform® can be used to facilitate virtual and hybrid engagement at all stages of the product lifecycle. Here, we share 10 of the most popular ways to...
Employee wellbeing in creative agencies: three tips to get you started
Paul Hutchings, founder of fox&cat, and new friend, Welfy, a workplace wellbeing training firm, discuss the importance of collaboration...
Managing unhelpful pressure in your creative agency: the human approach
Paul Hutchings, founder of fox&cat, answers the questions: what does it mean to be human in 2021? Are we putting ourselves under too much pressure?...