Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in
Email:
Password:

NICE wants more information from Roche on Zelboraf

Refuses to back skin cancer drug in second round of draft guidance

Roche - Zelboraf vemurafenib skin cancer

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is still set not to recommend Roche's Zelboraf (vemurafenib) and in a second round of draft guidance has called on the manufacturer to supply further information about its skin cancer drug.

Zelboraf, which had been put forward as a treatment for unresectable locally advance or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma, first failed to win backing from the UK cost-effectiveness body in June this year.

This time around NICE says it wants additional cost effectiveness analysis that justify Zelboraf's “significant cost”.

Professor Carole Longson, NICE's Health Technology Evaluation Centre director, said: “During consultation on the first draft recommendations, the manufacturer of vemurafenib submitted additional analysis on the effectiveness of the drug in relation to its cost. 

“When it was asked to consider this new information, our independent advisory committee concluded that they required further clarification to be able to make the decision to recommend or not recommend it for routine use in the NHS. It has therefore asked the manufacture to provide further analysis and clarification.

In response Roche said in a statement that it was “confident that vemurafenib should be recommended by NICE and will provide further information to help NICE make its decision”.

The company added: “NICE has already accepted that vemurafenib represents a 'step change' in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and that there is robust evidence that it is a life-extending therapy that qualifies for its end-of-life criteria”.

Roche also said the provision of Zelboraf through the Cancer Drug Fund has “resulted in many eligible patients receiving this treatment, demonstrating its clinical value to those treating the disease. However, this is little consolation to patients outside of England where there is no similar access mechanism”.

Roche has experienced a number of negative decisions by NICE over its recent drug submissions, including is advanced breast cancer drug Avastin, specifically relating to its cost effectiveness. 

The company's lung cancer drug Tarceva also faced reservations during its review process, but Roche was able to win a positive recommendation supply additional information to NICE.

10th August 2012

Share

Featured jobs

Subscribe to our email news alerts

PMHub

Add my company
Random42 Digital Healthcare Agency

Random42 is the world's premier medical animation company. Over the past 20 years we have created over 350 mechanism-of-action (MoA)...

Latest intelligence

The patient will see you now
GCI Health’s Laura Starr and Chris Bath report on how the dawning era of mobile tech and the ‘Internet of Things’ has transformed the health and wellness arena....
When forecasters take the floor: 6 tips on presenting a forecast
Peter Mansell queries some of pharma’s leading forecasters for their dos and don’ts on presenting a forecast...
Enablers of drug innovation could lie in the numbers
Christopher Ehinger of Black Swan Analysis addresses the problem of clinical-trial recruitment as a barrier to new drug development and offers a new way of looking at the problem....

Infographics