Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in

Roche biggest pharma R&D spender in PwC survey

Pharma giant on track to spend 21.9% of its total revenue on research this year


Pharma companies feature prominently among companies spending the most on R&D in 2017, with Roche, Merck & Co and Novartis heading the sector’s leader board.

The data comes from PwC Strategy & unit’s 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study, which this year focuses on the potential impact of rising economic nationalism and an increasingly inward-looking political landscape in countries such as the US and UK throwing the world of innovation “into uncertainty”.

Roche had a total expenditure of $11.4bn in 2017, a hefty 21.9% of its total revenue but only appeared seventh in the list, which was dominated by tech companies at the top including Amazon, Alphabet, Intel, Samsung and Microsoft.

Merck was eighth in the overall table with a spend of $10.1bn (25.4% of revenues) and Novartis sat in position ten (just behind Apple) with a $9.6bn spend that equated to 19.4% of revenues. Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Eli Lilly were the other pharma companies featuring in the top 25 listing.

Overall, annual worldwide corporate R&D spending broke through $700bn in annual investment, up 3% on the prior year, but an accompanying survey reveals the deep concern among multinationals about the rhetoric of economic nationalism, even if it has yet to develop into concreate actions. Many are starting to plan for increased barriers to trade within the next two to five years.

“The global innovation model long embraced by leading multinationals, one based on the free flow of information, money, and talent across borders, is at risk,” says the report. Co-author Barry Jaruzelski notes that while 94% of the world’s top companies conduct R&D across orders, 25% have reported pressure to change that approach.

“Nearly 33% of R&D executives surveyed, report that they have already felt the effects of economic nationalism on their R&D talent acquisition or retention because of visa or work restrictions - either losing employees, seeing less talent available, or in hiring more local talent,” says the report.

The three countries most at risk of being damaged by this nationalism are the US, UK and China, he said, with restrictions on talent particularly problematic in the first two countries where “a disproportionate number of scientists come from overseas.” China meanwhile has a different problem, as four-fifths of R&D that its companies rely on is conducted by non-Chinese companies.

Countries that are embracing a globalised model and open borders for technical talent - Canada, Germany and France for example - are likely to benefit if multinationals respond to economic protectionism as PwC expects, such creating “robust, autonomous nodes” in these countries even if their main headquarters lies elsewhere.

However, that would mean companies “losing efficiency and taking on higher costs if it is not managed effectively”, said Jaruzelski.

Article by
Phil Taylor

25th October 2017

From: Research



COVID-19 Updates and Daily News

Featured jobs


Add my company
11 London

The biggest problems facing humanity today are health-related, and the health of people, animals and our planet are inextricably linked. ...

Latest intelligence

The Patient Will See You Now – The Evolution of the Doctor-Patient Relationship
The doctor-patient relationship is an ever changing one that changes as society changes. Technology then helps to drive this change along with a wide number of other factors....
Mind the Gap – Challenging Immunisation Apathy and Misinformation
world, the biggest challenges remain apathy and misinformation. Since a measles vaccine was introduced in the UK in 1968, Public Health England estimates that 20 million measles cases and 4,500...
Towards Better HCP Engagement – An Email Masterclass
6% of HCPs prefer being contacted by email, compared to 17% who favour the second most popular option: direct interaction with reps....