Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in
Email:
Password:

Roche’s Avastin strikes out again with NICE

Pharma company fails to justify drug's cost in advanced breast cancer

Roche's Avastin

Roche's Avastin

Roche's Avastin has added advanced breast cancer to its growing list of unsuccessful appraisals by the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

The health technology assessment body ruled that Avastin (bevacizumab) does not provide enough patient benefit to justify its cost and has not recommended its use by the NHS in England.

In publishing its guidance NICE noted its consistently negative stance on Avastin in this indication had not met any objections from either Roche or other consultees at any stage of the appraisal process.

Andrew Dillon, NICE chief executive, said: “We can't recommend a drug that has not been shown to work as well as, or better than, current treatments and costs much more.

“Evidence presented to the independent Appraisal Committee did not conclusively show that bevacizumab, in combination with capecitabine, could improve overall survival or improve a patient's quality of life more than current treatment.

“These uncertainties combined with the high cost of bevacizumab mean the drug simply isn't cost-effective.”

Avastin (bevacizumab) was appraised, in combination with Roche's chemotherapy drug Xeloda (capecitabine), as a first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in people for whom treatment with other chemotherapy options, including taxanes or anthracyclines, are not appropriate.

The average monthly cost of using Avastin in this setting comes to around £3,690. In earlier guidance NICE's appraisal committee said the most plausible Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for Avastin was more than £82,000 per QALY gained.

The drug's role in breast cancer was brought into question last year though, after studies suggested that the risks associated with the drug outweighed its benefits in advanced breast cancer.

In the US, the FDA stripped Avastin of its approval in that indication last November, while in 2010 the EMA restricted its use to only include combination with paclitaxel. Later, the EU agency said treatment alongside Xeloda was also an option.

Although the drug was the most requested under the English Cancer Drugs Fund, NICE has consistently refused to recommend its use in any setting. The Institute's negative guidance has previously included Avastin for use in combination with a taxane for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, as well as for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

22nd August 2012

Share

Featured jobs

Subscribe to our email news alerts

PMHub

Add my company
Wordbird

Wordbird is a healthcare communications agency with creative, compelling copy at its heart....

Latest intelligence

How will Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs) change the NHS commissioning landscape?
Sue Thomas and Paul Midgley, of Wilmington Healthcare, take a look at new commissioning structures and what they mean for pharma...
eyeforpharma Barcelona 2017 highlights: Industry at the brink of transformation
Hear what Anthill's delegates reported back from the biggest eyeforpharma Barcelona yet....
Pharma China Annual Forum 2017
We are delighted to be presenting a paper at the Pharma China Annual Forum on 14th April 2017 in Shanghai, China....

Infographics