Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in

Study shows R&D returns too low in pharma to be sustainable

Deloitte study shows drop in profit and rise in costs

Study shows R&D returns too low in pharma to be sustainable 

Returns on R&D in the drug industry are too low to sustain future pipeline investment, according to a new Deloitte study.

While the number of new drugs reaching the market last year reached a record 43 products, the headline figure masks underlying problems that will require a transformation of the R&D approach to fix, the study suggests.

The report - Measuring the return from pharmaceutical innovations 2015: Transforming R&D returns in uncertain times - reveals that R&D returns for the top 12 pharma companies in 2015 have fallen to 4.2% - less than half the 10.2% return enjoyed in 2010.

The bottom line is that costs to develop new products are rising - from an average of $1.18bn in 2010 to an estimated $1.58bn this year - while average peak sales have halved from $816m to $416m.

"The numbers simply do not add up for life sciences R&D to generate an appropriate return," notes Deloitte. 

Some companies have responded with a push into specialty therapeutics, but they need to be mindful about potentially missing valuable opportunities in primary care categories.

On the plus side, costs associated with terminated R&D projects have reduced from $80bn in 2010 to $30bn this year. Meanwhile, a new cohort of four smaller, mid-to large-cap companies - included in the report for the first time this year - paints a rosier picture.

This group see 13% higher average peak sales, spend 25% less on average to develop an asset and get a 17% return on their investments, more than three times the average across the entire cohort of 16 companies. That suggests bigger companies are struggling to perform as well as their smaller counterparts.

"While the outlook shows uncertain times for the industry, the solutions appear to be relatively straightforward," commented Neil Lesser, life sciences R&D strategy lead at Deloitte US.

"Focusing on fewer core therapy areas, and building end-to-end scientific, regulatory and commercial capabilities in those areas, may provide the greatest chance of holistically addressing the complexity of successfully bringing a drug to market," he noted.

Other key factors include making external collaborations a core component in the R&D engine - something that the smaller cohort of companies seems to achieve with greater efficacy - and "being bold to reduce development complexity, streamlining functions and addressing unproductive infrastructure".

Article by
Phil Taylor

16th December 2015

From: Sales



Featured jobs

Subscribe to our email news alerts


Add my company
Market Access Transformation

Market Access Transformation (MAT), founded by industry veterans Baiju Aurora and Paul Howard, specializes in developing cutting edge technologies that...

Latest intelligence

Report: Achieving launch excellence in the challenging healthcare markets of today
Our in-depth report is based on original data and expert interviews, which coupled with our own experience, ensures we give you the best recommendations for achieving launch success in challenging...
What is blockchain and why should i care - Richard Springham
Four Health - Emerging Technologies The power of blockchain lies in the fact it can prove that a unique event occurred at a certain time with out the need to...
NHS medicines optimisation milestone
Steve How, Paul Midgley and Oli Hudson, of the Wilmington Healthcare Consulting Team, explore the implications of Adalimumab’s recent European patent expiry...