Excellence In Engagement Through Social Media/Digital Channels – Over £50,001

Sponsored by:

This award recognises those campaigns delivered solely through social media and/or digital channels, with a budget of £50,001 or more. Entries must demonstrate a deep understanding of the target audience(s) and their social/digital behaviours, evidence-based selection and utilisation of the appropriate digital and/or social media channels; relevant and creative content creation delivered through innovative ways, with strong output and outcome metrics.

To win this award the highest standards of excellence need to be shown in:

• Audience segmentation
• User mapping and engagement planning
• Evidence supporting the channels selection
• Innovative, creative and relevant content creation that clearly highlights the key campaign messaging
• Interactive content and impactful messaging – with clear call to action and engagement tools
• Metrics to identify success against predefined criteria.
• Working with partners/providers to ensure content meets the needs of the audience, as well as the industry.
• Show how the campaign created a real and tangible impact among the target audience
• Anticipation and management of potential risks

Entries should demonstrate first-class strategic thinking and exceptional implementation (in line with the EFPIA, ABPI and PAGB Codes of Practice).

Judges will want you to put your campaign into context, at the outset, to clarify the rationale behind your channel selection, audience segmentation and understanding of social/digital channels, strategy and tactics. They need to know what your ambitions were and how social media/digital channels were used to drive them.

Work conducted during the 18-month period between July 2021 and December 2022 will be eligible. If the submission has been entered previously, the current entry must provide benchmarks to clearly demonstrate how the programme was evaluated and how it has developed over time.

Don’t forget:

• provide a copy of any previous submission for this work
• be open! Were there any other contributors to the programme?

JUDGING CRITERIA AND ENTRY FORMAT:

Entry Title

Please give a simple title for your entry of no more than ten words

Executive Summary – 200 words. 0 (zero) marks

This will be used if your entry is selected as a finalist and does not need to be anonymised.

Main entry

1. Budget Band Information, as below:

Band A £50,001-£100,000
Band B £100,001-£200,000
Band C over £200,001.

If your client has declined to allow this, you must state this within your submission.

• Failure to provide the budget band seriously impacts the judge’s ability to assess the entry against other entries and may result in the entry being disqualified
• The budget band provides important context for judging the innovation, delivery and impact of a piece of work.
• Impressive work is not always dependent on budget size, so there is no right or wrong budget.

2. Situation Analysis and Benchmarking– 15 marks (300 words)

• In this section you should show the judges how well you understood the situation at the start of the project
• Use this section/analysis to clearly lay out benchmark data that you will refer to in your measurement of effectiveness later
• Show the judges the best information, data and insights you have about uptake of health interventions, current practice, defining/segmenting audiences, identifying educational or information needs, which channels will best reach the audience, competitive environment, creative landscape before the start of your work.

3. Objectives – 15 marks (250 words)

Describe the objectives for the project or programme including outputs (i.e., what materials/platforms are produced), out-takes (i.e., post-event evaluation, surveys showing changes in knowledge/understanding, social media/website engagement, sharing and commenting), and outcomes (i.e., changes in patient behaviour or outcomes, clinical practice or health policy versus the benchmark stated in the situation analysis) and specifically how these will be measured

4. Strategy – 15 marks (250 words)

• Please outline what your strategy was and why
• Refer to the data and insight in the situation analysis section
• Explain why this was the right strategy and any points to emphasise bold or innovative strategy selection.

5. Implementation – 15 marks (400 words)

• Please describe how you implemented the project or programme
• Please briefly outline why these specific tactics were selected
• For a programme this should include describing what tactics were deployed to implement the strategy
• For a meeting or stand-alone event this should describe how the meeting or event was delivered.

6a. Effectiveness Part One: Outputs and Out-takes vs Objectives - 10 marks (200 words)

• To help the judges assess the strength of the evaluation, please describe how successful the project or programme was in terms of outputs and out-takes achieved versus the relevant measurements set in the Objectives section
• You may include comments from third-party stakeholders in this section but ONLY if they clearly help to demonstrate the impact of the work and were a pre-planned part of your measurement approach

6b. Effectiveness Part Two: Outcomes vs Objectives - 10 marks (200 words)

• To help the judges assess the strength of the evaluation, please describe how successful the project or programme was in terms of the outcomes achieved versus the relevant measurements set in the Objectives section
• You may include comments from third-party stakeholders in this section but ONLY if they clearly help to demonstrate the impact of the work and were a pre-planned part of your measurement approach

Supporting Materials

Please only send information that helps the judges to see how you researched, planned, implemented and measured the programme within each specific category, e.g.:

• Information supporting audience segmentation and their social/digital behaviours/habits
• Evidence behind the selection of channels
• Information illustrating how the strategy was brought to life is helpful but we don’t need a copy of every item
• Information supporting the evaluation and measurement is the most relevant
• ESSENTIAL: a summary sheet must be supplied detailing each piece of supporting material and clearly identifying where evidence can be found to support claims in the entry
• PLUS: An approved visual image or video that supports the entry for use in print, results pages online and in the AV.