Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in

Humana lawsuit targets Mallinckrodt's 'billion-dollar golden goose'

Latest twist in long story of Acthar


US health insurer Humana has filed a lawsuit against Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals seeking to recoup some of the “ill-gotten gains” the defendant allegedly made from Acthar.

The case alleges that Humana overpaid by $700m for on Acthar because of illegal practices that enabled Mallinckrodt and Questcor, the former owner of the drug, to increase the price from $40 to $39,000 (although this increase was over a period of 17 years).

“These eye-popping price increases are not an accident, a market anomaly or a necessary by product of legislation. They are the intended result of purposeful and illegal conduct,” the lawsuit alleges. “This conduct consists of a complex, multipart scheme involving monopoly, bribery, racketeering, fraud and other deceptive and unfair practices.”

Humana’s case makes three broad allegations. Firstly, the insurer alleges Mallinckrodt acquired the rights to a synthetic version of Acthar from Novartis but “never seriously attempted” to bring it to market, thereby eliminating a competitor that could have brought the price of the drug down.

Secondly, Humana alleges Mallinckrodt artificially inflated demand “by using a charitable foundation for the illegal purpose of paying patient co-pays”.

The nonprofit allegedly used money from Mallinckrodt to provide patient assistance funds solely for Acthar.

“In other words, it was a bribe to patients and a vehicle through which Mallinckrodt could persuade physicians that the astronomical price of the drug should not be a barrier to prescribing it,” the lawsuit alleges.

Finally, Humana alleges Mallinckrodt maintained the artificially inflated demand “through a pervasive bribery scheme to doctors”.The lawsuit identifies at least 20 doctors who allegedly received “thinly disguised bribes” totalling upward of $250,000 over a three-year period.

The allegations are the latest twist in the long story of Acthar, a drug which was developed by Armour, a meat company, in the 1940s as a byproduct of pork processing.

Acthar came to market in the US in 1952 with a broad label reflecting the approval practices of the time and evidence that the drug triggers anti-inflammatory responses.

Over the decades, other drugs superseded Acthar in many, but not all, indications, culminating in Aventis Pharmaceuticals selling the asset to Questcor for $100,000 in 2001.

At that time, the drug cost $40, according to the lawsuit. Questcor allegedly increased the price to $750 immediately after buying the asset but the big jump was still to come.

In 2007, the price went from $1,650 to $23,269 according to the lawsuit. The price continued to tick up over the following years, both before and after Mallinckrodt paid $5.6bn to acquire Questcor in 2014.

Article by
Nick Taylor

13th August 2019

From: Sales



COVID-19 Updates and Daily News

Featured jobs


Add my company
Hanover Communications

Healthcare is evolving rapidly. To stand out from the crowd requires a potent combination of rich insight, innovative ideas and...

Latest intelligence

How innovating study sites can improve patient recruitment efficiency
There are so many ways that clinical trials have innovated over the last few years. There is now a larger focus on making trials more patient-centric, more virtualised, and more...
Avoiding A Series of Unfortunate Events: launch lessons from lockdown
Chris Ross takes a novel look at launch excellence through the lens of COVID-19 and explores how pharma’s launch leaders are rewriting the story...
6 reasons patients drop out of clinical trials and 6 ways to fix it
If you’ve successfully recruited patients for your clinical trial, but one by one, they begin to drop out, then this information could be for you....