Perhaps the key challenge in the planning and implementation of any European cross-national programme is securing the enthusiasm, buy-in and commitment of the local operating companies (LOCs).
How well has this worked in the past? Which initiatives have previously failed to secure LOC support? Why? A brief that accurately reflects LOCs' needs, is invaluable.
Potential service providers
Section | Content |
Background | • Key data about your company, the product, the key competitors |
Objective | • Programme objectives and scope of work • The anticipated result • What effect should the communication have? • What do you want the target audience to think, to feel, to do? |
Target audience | • Who exactly are we talking to? • Target group(s) including geographical information |
Brand positioning | • The main advantages/disadvantages (factual and/or emotional) of your product and competitor products • After the project, how should the audience perceive your product? |
Key messages | • Key messages in a priority order, eg, by audience and geography |
Timing and budget information | • A timetable showing the proposed agency presentation date(s) • The budget allocated for this activity, or a 'ball park' guide? |
Key contact point and availability | • Main contact point and availability • Handling of agency questions (ie, email or by phone, specific time or ad hoc?) • Ask for a single point of contact |
What implication does a pan-European remit have for the briefing process? | |
Company culture/structure | • For example, regional versus local autonomy |
Product approval/ lifecycle status | • By country: European mutual recognition procedures mean that the regulatory authorities in a single national market can be influential in establishing a product's perceived safety and value across Europe. This has implications both for licence approvals and for pricing |
Product target/aspiration | • By country, region or other criteria |
National resource | • What team, if any, do the national markets have in place? |
Priority markets | • Which markets require the most attention? Those with the greatest earning potential or those who have the least local resource? |
KEEs/spokespeople | • Location/nationality/viewpoint of top-tier specialists |
Ongoing research | • Location of live clinical research sites |
SPP/CME | • Existing strategic publication plan (SPP) and any existing medical education (CME) activities |
Other relevant information | • Should the campaign take into consideration any legal or self-regulatory constraints specific to your company, market and therapy area? • Will you need specialised assistance and in-depth local market understanding from your agency? • Are the desired communication channels appropriate for the local market restrictions, eg, access to new media? • Other idiosyncrasies unique to the company, product or disease state |
Approval process | • What is the pitch process? • How many agencies are involved? • Who are the decision makers? • Communicate a decision timeline • When would you like work to start? |
The Authors
Mark Forbes Irving, managing director and Glenn Mursell, associate director, client services, Wells Healthcare Communications can be contacted on +44 (0)1892 511600.
To comment on this article, email editor@pmlive.com
Related articles: A Fine Balance
No results were found
Impetus Digital has offered virtual advisory boards, clinical trial investigator consortiums, co-author publication working groups, steering committees, and medical education...