Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in
Email:
Password:

UK watchdog: Pfizer and Flynn Pharma overcharged NHS

Accusations of price-gouging dating back to 2012 are upheld by UK competition authority

CMA

For nine years Pfizer has argued that its decision to de-branded its epilepsy drug Epanutin (phenytoin) was made in the best interests of patients.

However, after the decision resulted in a 2,600% price increase that cost the NHS £50m in 2013 alone, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) took another view.

In 2016, a CMA investigation found that Pfizer and its UK partner Flynn Pharma, broke competition law by charging “unfairly high” prices for phenytoin, which is used by an estimated 48,000 epilepsy patients in the UK to prevent and control seizures.

After the CMA issued a fine of £84.2m, Pfizer’s objections and several years of legal wrangling led the UK watchdog to re-open its investigation this year.

According to the CMA’s provisional view: “As Pfizer and Flynn were the dominant suppliers of the drug in the UK, the NHS had no choice but to pay unfairly high prices for this vital medicine.”

Explaining the decision, CMA chief executive Andrea Coscelli said: “Thousands of patients depend on this drug to prevent life-threatening seizures as a result of their epilepsy.” He added that the matter was “important for government, for the public as patients and taxpayers, and for the pharmaceutical industry itself. Protecting these patients, the NHS and the taxpayers who fund it, is our priority”.

NHS spending on phenytoin sodium capsules rose “overnight” from around £2m a year in 2012 to about £50m in 2013, said the CMA. “For over four years, Pfizer’s prices were between 780% and 1,600% higher than it had previously charged. Pfizer then supplied the drug to Flynn, which sold it to wholesalers and pharmacies at prices between 2,300% and 2,600% higher than those they had paid previously.”

Pfizer and Flynn now have an opportunity to respond to the provisional findings, which the CMA will “carefully consider” to decide whether they broke the law.

The Pfizer/Flynn decision is part of a crackdown on illegal behaviour by drug companies overcharging the NHS. In recent weeks, the CMA has fined several companies linked to Auden Mckenzie and Actavis UK, now known as Accord-UK, a total of £260m for inflating the price of essential drug hydrocortisone, and fined Advanz and its former private equity owners more than £100m for inflating the price of liothyronine, used to treat thyroid hormone deficiency, by up to 6,000%.

A number of other CMA investigations are continuing.

Article by
Hugh Gosling

6th August 2021

From: Regulatory

Share

Tags

Subscribe to our email news alerts

PMHub

Add my company
Create Health

A specialist Advertising and Med Comms agency dedicated to bringing much-needed creativity to healthcare marketing. We believe that brilliant ideas...

Latest intelligence

The 17th World Congress on Controversies in Neurology
This year, there was a focus on the rare disease neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder that strikes suddenly and mainly impacts women...
Archetypes: Rethinking go-to-market expectations to drive commercial success
In this white paper, our consultants analyze trends spanning global policy developments, rising inflation, and increasingly complex customer journeys, and reveal a new data-driven approach to archetyping that crystalizes the...
Tuberculosis – why it remains a major global public health challenge
Innovative collaboration is required to address the major public health challenges around TB and expedite drug development...