Please login to the form below

Not currently logged in

Strategic planning: why do good strategies sometimes fail?

By Berit Sund and Heather Grant

Now more than ever we look to our leaders for guidance – arguably, we may have to look deep into the past for sound advice! Today, Winston Churchill’s counsel is as relevant as ever: “However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results” – a clear nod to the value of strategic planning and execution. One definition of strategic planning is ‘the art of formulating strategies, implementing and evaluating impact, based on organizational objectives’.

It’s a misconception that only bad strategies fail – even the best strategy is worthless, if executed poorly, or not at all. One survey, by management consultants Marakon Associates, found that firms delivered only ~60% of their strategic plan’s promises.

So, what could go wrong? The Wharton Business School identifies three reasons why even good strategies fail: execution, execution, execution …

Importantly, what can we do about it? There are two schools of thought on improving execution: People vs Process. It’s hard to see how we can have one without the other, and in reality they’re more like two inextricably linked sides of the same coin.

Perhaps ironically, successful execution and strategic action originate at the start-line. The science of human behaviour also applies here: involve stakeholders, seek input and listen to internal as well as external experts.

Ultimately, we must create a catalyst for strategic action, galvanising a team through cross-functional engagement – so that they’re fully aligned to your strategic plan, and act accordingly. This people-centric process of co-creation promotes a sense of commitment and support that’s essential for effective execution.

Providing clarity on expected outcomes – defining your KPIs based on robust analytics – and translating this into clear actions and choices, provides a powerful impetus for independent initiative and innovation. Effective communication is a twoway street, and by listening to your stakeholders and refining a programme accordingly, this helps minimise any potential disconnect between strategy and delivery. A process of continuously tracking KPIs, will enable you to course-correct and reinforce your programme over time – ultimately creating a strategic shift towards goal.

A recent Harvard Business Review reminds us to be patient: 'Strategic execution is not a moment in time. It’s thousands of moments across time.' Success isn’t achieved with one giant leap towards goal, but many small steps towards the finish-line.

Berit Sund is Managing Director (EVP), Medical Education, dna Communications and Heather Grant is Managing Director, dna London

In association with

16th June 2020

From: Marketing


COVID-19 Updates and Daily News

Featured jobs


Add my company
Havas Lynx Group

We are the Havas Lynx Group. Devoted to fresh thinking. Changing the way the world does healthcare communications for the...

Latest intelligence

Patient-centricity in improving patient recruitment advertising
This blog looks into the importance of concepts and patient centricity in patient recruitment....
AI and life sciences
AI: the smart money is on the smart thinking
Looking at the three key areas where AI is being applied: drug discovery, clinical decision-making and clinical trials...
Virtual Engagement At Porterhouse: Reflections on the past few months
A look at how the pitfalls of virtual engagement can be avoided and the key advantages of virtual client and KOL engagement strategies in a now predominantly digital world....