Pharmafile Logo

Electronic medical records and doctor/patient communication

April 2, 2015 |  

View from the US: When I talk to family members or friends who are physicians these days, I hear a lot of complaints.

What seems to get US doctors I talk to most agitated is an aspect of Obamacare that gets relatively little attention outside the healthcare community:  the “forced” conversion of medical practices to electronic medical records (EMR).
Under legislation signed in 2009, physicians were given a January 2015 deadline to convert to EMR and show “meaningful use” of these systems or face lower reimbursement rates on Medicare physician fees – a penalty of 1 percent of Medicare payments, increasing to 2 percent in 2016 and 3 percent in 2017.  To help offset the cost of EMR conversion, the federal government is offering individual practitioners up to $44,000 in incentive payments under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  With both a carrot and a stick in place, physician practices, large and small, have been converting en masse.  

For many US physician practices, implementing EMR software and converting paper patient records to electronic form has been massively disruptive, as well as costly.  My own primary care practice, a small physician group, cut back on the number of patients seen per day for several months while their doctors and staff learned the new system.
Even with the financial and administrative challenges, what some doctors find to be the most difficult aspect of the conversion to EMR is the way it impacts the daily practice of medicine by changing how they communicate with patients, and thus altering the doctor-patient relationship.  With increasing time pressures, some clinicians feel they need to type into their computer or tablet while talking to patients, their face buried in the screen.  Many  find this takes their focus away from what the patient is saying, and leads them to miss picking up on some cues, or gaining a more holistic understanding of the patient.  On the other hand, some believe the greater access to information through the EMR system, and elimination of the need to scan through paper records, improves patient care.

A 2008 study conducted by the Center for Studying Health System Change found EMR systems both help and hinder communication between doctors and patients, as well as clinician-clinician interactions.  As system designs improve and physicians gain increasing familiarity with the technology, the positives should outpace the negatives.  Certainly, for the new generation of physicians (like my daughter, who is a third year medical student), who are learning the practice of medicine with these tools, the use of EMR should be second nature.

As a market researcher, who has seen MR evolve from largely face-to-face to largely web-based, I wonder if there are parallels for our industry…  Is our evolving technology promoting or hindering engaging in dialogue with respondents?  It certainly is possible for researchers to be distracted by the “latest and greatest” technological innovation in MR.  The key is to be able to leverage our technology to gain richer insights and understanding, not simply more data.

Research Partnership is one of the largest independent healthcare market research and consulting agencies in the world. Trusted partner to the global pharmaceutical industry, we use our expertise and experience to deliver intelligent, tailor-made solutions. We provide strategic recommendations that go beyond research, helping our clients to answer their fundamental business challenges. Find out more here: http://bit.ly/1FbCHZG

This content was provided by Research Partnership

Company Details

 Latest Content from  Research Partnership 

Understanding the chronic disease patient journey in emerging markets

In this paper, we will explore the chronic disease patient journey in emerging markets and provide you with the insights you require to identify the key inflection points in these...

Infographic: Keeping tracking on track

Our best practice approach to tracking studies.

Telehealth Research

The remote exchange of data between patients and their clinician

Case Study: Understanding the patient journey and addiction treatment pathways

Our client had previously conducted some research and knew that a large proportion of target patients also had addiction issues. They wanted to know more about addiction treatment pathways and...

Research Partnership has published a new Living with Chronic Pain market report for 2016

Chronic pain is defined as pain lasting longer than 6 months and affects 100 million Americans. Living with Chronic Pain is a quantitative study conducted online amongst 390 US patients...

Nutraceuticals: Rich in Potential

Published in eyeforpharma October 2016 by Marc Yates

Case Study: Qualitative research with payers in low and middle income countries

Our client wanted to understand in detail the usage decision drivers, triggers and processes for a high-cost innovative Acute Heart Failure (AHF) drug used in the acute emergency setting in...

Case study: Leveraging Market Research Data to Inform Healthcare Providers and the Community

Our client wanted to understand why uptake of HPV vaccination in the Asia-Pacific region was limited.  In order to help increase uptake, they wanted to publish the market research findings...

Towards a culture of evaluation and evidence-based decision making in global health

Reflections on THET Conference 2016: Evidence, Effectiveness & Impact