Pharmafile Logo

Fighting talk

April 2, 2015 | Cancer 

One thing that grasps my interest is how society has adopted military style language when talking about cancer

Treatments are described as “defending” or “protecting” whilst cancer patients themselves are “fighters” who “battle” to “beat” the disease. These abstract metaphors of war are used in an attempt to articulate that cancer is a very emotional experience for all involved.

This terminology is intriguing to me, as whilst widely recognised as persuasive, it is also considered controversial.  War-like analogies suggest that there will be a “winner”, “loser”, and a “battlefield”. Sadly there are hundreds of types of cancer, and short of resection, there is no definitive cure for any of them. Many patients inevitably end up the “loser” as they endure a “battle” against symptoms of the disease, and the side effects of therapy – which all too often only gains a few more months PFS before the “fight” is “lost”. Perhaps more poignantly, their own bodies are the “battlefield” where this all takes place. I have to ask myself, how do progressed metastatic patients feel anything other than failure when we talk about the disease in this way? 
When I’ve personally conducted interviews with medical professionals and patients alike, I hear time and time again their aversion to this style of language. Oncologists have even told me that in medical school they were taught to actively avoid using this vocabulary, and as a result they are unresponsive to any type of marketing materials delivered in this style.

So why, when companies are spending so much time and resources into researching effective messaging, are we continuing to use language that knowingly disengages the target audience? As researchers we know that it’s imperative to ensure that brand messaging speaks directly, and appropriately, to our target audience – and sometimes when conducting research that’s not always just about what the respondent says but rather, how they say it. By including some extra language profiling questions and completing an extra step of analysis when conducting market research, we can determine what segments are likely to exhibit a particular trend of language compared to another segment. The value to this insight is that our language is usually indicative of our behaviour; thus providing an extra layer of understanding into the minds of customers in terms of how they might behave in a particular context, which can inform both communications and sales materials.

Knowing what language ‘works’ for different customers can bring to life the other key factors that are relevant to each audience segment – which not only increases buy-in at implementation but also tailors the communication for optimal outcomes.

With approximately 100 projects conducted in oncology within the last 2 years, it’s the single largest therapeutic area studied at the Research Partnership, and it is clear to see that advances in detecting, diagnosing, and treating cancer have evolved – and are continuing to evolve at a significant rate. Perhaps it’s time we also evolve the way we talk about it, ensuring that we speak in language relevant to the target audience, avoid the “fighting talk” clichés and start using unique positive terminology to talk about “life beyond cancer”?

Research Partnership is one of the largest independent healthcare market research and consulting agencies in the world. Trusted partner to the global pharmaceutical industry, we use our expertise and experience to deliver intelligent, tailor-made solutions. We provide strategic recommendations that go beyond research, helping our clients to answer their fundamental business challenges.Find out more here: http://bit.ly/1IxUzjW

This content was provided by Research Partnership

Company Details

 Latest Content from  Research Partnership 

Guide

UX research

Article: Why pharma must trust the science of behaviour

In a recent interview with PME Magazine, Dan Coffin, Director explains why the application of behavioural science will be key to better health far beyond COVID-19.Read the full article here:...

Case study

Using qualitative conjoint to assess willingness-to-pay

Consumer health specialist joins Research Partnership Inc

Global healthcare market research consultancy Research Partnership has appointed Jennifer Stewart as a Director in their US offices in Philadelphia.

Article: What’s next? How behavioural science can support pharma’s future

Dan Coffin, Director explains why now is an opportune time for pharma marketers to embrace behavioural science. Read his latest article for PME Magazine.https://bit.ly/31ef6rh

Video: UX/ Experience design research

Director and UX expert Liza Pliss discusses Research Partnership's approach to user experience research and shares an example of a project where using design thinking led to an agile approach...

White paper: The impact of COVID-19 on chronic disease management

Therapy Watch, Research Partnership's syndicated PRF tracker, has been investigating the impact of COVID-19 on chronic disease management. In this white paper, Research Partnership share some of the insights and...

Article: Pricing a coronavirus vaccine

Using findings from Research Partnership's recent COVID-19 impact study, Market Access Directors Rachel Howard and Brett Gardiner and Consultant Suzan Serip explore the challenges of pricing a coronavirus vaccine. Read...

News: Living with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

Living with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn’s Disease (CD) are new patient syndicated reports which offer valuable insights into patient attitudes and behaviour towards their condition, treatments and unmet needs. These reports...

Interactive infographic

Living With: The journey from the patient’s perspective