Please login to the form below

#DemandDiversity: Can new medical publication guidelines help fix diversity in clinical trials?

Over the last 8 months, JAMA have been working on a new set of guidelines for research papers looking to publish with them, which is summarised in their latest editorial release, “The Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals”. Substantial changes have been made in the race/ethnicity data section. But what does this mean?

If authors and editors wish to publish their clinical trial data with JAMA, they need to adhere to the writing style guide, this means that their papers must include demographic information on race and ethnicity. Game changer.

What does the revision actually say?

If you have a spare 10 minutes, then the full article is definitely worth reading. But, just in case you don’t have the time, here’s a short summary of the changes.

1. First up – definitions. The revisions come as a result of shifts in sociocultural factors, and this section of the article clarifies that as sociocultural factors change, so will their definitions of both race and ethnicity.

2. Next – concerns, sensitivities, and controversies. This part outlines how ethnicity and race can be related to other factors, such as socioeconomic status, structural, institutional, demographics, and more. This means that JAMA acknowledges that trends in health outcomes can appear to be related to ethnicity and race, when they are actually a more complicated mix of a few factors.

However, this is also where the article shows the significance of reporting ethnic and racial data. JAMA highlights the benefits of reporting race and ethnicity in clinical research, explaining that clinical research can only be accurately applied to the wider population if the study populations are representative.

3. This is the exciting part – updates to the guidance for reporting ethnicity/race data in research articles. Here’s a summary of the new expectations for reporting this data.

Now, any clinical research articles submitted to JAMA must:

  • Report age, sex, socioeconomic factors, and race/ethnicity data in both the methods and results sections.
  • If one factor is missing, the clinical papers must give reasons as to why that is.

4. The article then goes on to report guidance on using racial/ethnic terms, and rules about writing styles for these terms.

So, what does the reporting of race and ethnicity data mean?

The above guidance, particularly point 3, means that racial/ethnic data either has to be collected and reported, or the research must state why it’s not included. This is really similar to when the Nation Institute of Health (NIH) released a policy called ‘sex as a biological variable’, in an attempt to rectify the underrepresentation of women and female animals in clinical research. The effects of this guidance have been shown in this five-year progress report released last year, alongside other policies and ongoing efforts by the NIH. Now, nearly three decades on from the first requirement for inclusion of women in clinical studies in the U.S. (the 1993 NIH Revitalisation Act), we are seeing how effective such policies can be. So, it’s definitely positive so see the introduction of similar policies to increase representation of ethnic minorities in clinical trials.

What can you do?

The new guidance from JAMA is inviting people to make further comments about the new guidance. If you are reading this - please do make sure you review - comment and make your voice heard.

So, if you’ve made it to the end of this blog, then it’d be a great help to provide JAMA with comments and feedback about the new updates to the guidance and how this could be improved. Alternatively, you could share the article to help spread awareness to other journals, writers, and editors. Here’s the link to the editorial!

This blog was originally published here.

22nd April 2021



Company Details

COUCH Health

+44 (0) 330 995 0656

Contact Website

Suite 2.10, Jactin House
24 Hood Street
M4 6WX
United Kingdom

Latest content on this profile

COUCH Health publishes report to encourage patient engagement in the MedTech sector
Manchester, UK, 27 February 2023 — COUCH Health today announced the publication of a new report “The Power of Patient Engagement in MedTech”.
COUCH Health
#DemandDiversity: Why cultural safety is an important step towards achieving diversity in clinical trials
In our recent Demand Diversity research, a Black American participant said, “I wish people were more educated. Doctors are supposed to treat everyone the same, not have favourites. They need unconscious bias training.”
COUCH Health
How do ethnic minority groups in the U.S. view clinical trials?
This year, we decided to do the same with ethnic minority communities over in the United States (U.S.) too. Ultimately, we wanted to explore attitudes towards clinical trials from these communities, understand the barriers in participation, and determine what factors may influence people’s decisions to take part.
COUCH Health
Three things to consider when using social listening research for patient recruitment
We are looking at how patient research can power your patient recruitment campaign. A look into social listening follows on from this blog perfectly, offering a stronger and more authentic alternative to relying on data trends to guide your activities. So, let’s get started…
COUCH Health
4 ways mobile ethnography studies can elevate your patient insights
How can we achieve more real-life, in-the-moment insights from different groups to understand their thoughts and behaviours? This is where ethnography studies come in.
COUCH Health
#DemandDiversity: We’re calling on the clinical trials industry to include us all
The lack of diversity in clinical trials is something we’ve spoken about time and time again. By now, you might think we sound a bit like a broken record. But, the fact is, many people still aren’t aware of the underrepresentation, especially those who don’t work in the industry. Do you think if the clinical research industry could see the people they were leaving out of clinical trials, and hear how they felt about being underrepresented, it would make a difference?
COUCH Health