When we think about behaviour change we tend to do so mostly in terms of ‘why’ people change but not necessarily about ‘how’ they change. Much of the available literature focuses on theories of behaviour as opposed to behaviour change. It is a minefield.
Until the late 1970s, when leading US-based psychologists James Prochaska (Director of Cancer Prevention Research Center and Professor of Clinical and Health Psychology at the University of Rhode Island, USA) and Carlo DiClemente (Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Maryland, USA) started work on their Transtheoretical Model (TTM),1 the field was fragmented with around 300 theories on behaviour change in existence.2
TTM is based on principles developed over 35 years. It is an integrative, biopsychosocial model that explores intentional behaviour change, integrating key constructs from 25 leading psychotherapy theories into a comprehensive model that can be applied to a variety of behaviours.
Stages of change
There are six stages to achieving change and people progress – not always sequentially – through each stage on their way to success. The model has been applied in many therapy areas including, eating disorders, medicines compliance and cancer screening, with the aim of understanding success factors that underpin behavioural change.
Six stages
While the time that an individual may spend at each stage is variable, often depending on the behaviour that needs to be changed and the urgency surrounding it, the tasks required to move to the next stage are not. Certain techniques work best at each stage to reduce resistance, promote progress and prevent relapse. These principles include decisional balance, self-efficacy and the processes of change.
Less than 20% of the population who are at risk if they do not change their behaviour are willing to take action. As such, action-oriented guidance is unlikely to be effective in the early stages of change for around 80% of us. As a healthcare professional (HCP) actively looking to catalyse change in their patients, this is a challenge that needs to be overcome if concordance is to improve.
Here we take a look at the steps and the techniques that can be deployed to support patients are they move from one stage to another.
Precontemplation – not ready to change
Individuals at this stage have no intention of changing in the near future (set at six months). For them it is very much ‘ignorance is bliss’.
Techniques for moving to the next stage:
Techniques for moving to the next stage:
Techniques for moving to the next stage:
Techniques for moving to the next stage:
Techniques for moving to the next stage:
Relapse is also a consideration. Although it was not a stage discussed by Prochaska and DiClemente in the original article, it signals a return to old behaviours having made attempts to change. It is important for HCPs to explore the triggers for regression, re-assess motivations and barriers, and support the development of stronger coping mechanisms.
These six steps belie the complexities that underpin how, when, why and if we can make changes. It is all about timing and assessing accurately where in the cycle patients are, tailoring the conversation to the stage they are at currently. It is about knowing when to introduce the concept of an intervention and how to do so effectively. There are of course incidences when time is a luxury and for a variety of reasons immediate concordance with a treatment regimen is a must.
Find out more
Understanding behaviour change is one of a series of articles focused on how companies can make the most of these opportunities, exploring how communication between industry and HCPs, and between HCPs and their patients can be taken to the next level to improve patient outcomes.
To find out more and to download other guides from the series, visit https://pageandpage.uk.com/media_lab
Address:
The Ministry
79-81 Borough Road
London
SE1 1DN
United Kingdom