Please login to the form below

Why patient education isn’t simple

The terms patient education, patient activation and patient engagement are increasingly popular as healthcare becomes more patient-centric. In this article, Clare Mariconda discusses how the concepts link together and shares practical ways to first engage patients so they can be educated and ultimately take action that positively impacts on their own health.
Patient education is often understood to be the imparting of knowledge from the healthcare professional (HCP) to the patient and/or their caregiver. However, in most cases, the imparting of knowledge is not enough. 
True patient education can be described as “The process by which the patient comes to comprehend his or her condition and self-care”[1]. So, instead of just passing on information, for education to actually take place there needs to be comprehension, understanding and arguably motivation for patients to take notice and take action that improves their own health situation.

To effectively educate patients, patient engagement with their healthcare situation is the HCP’s first challenge. The challenge is inherently complex because every patient, their circumstances and attitude to their healthcare situation is unique. One aspect of difference amongst patients is highlighted by Rotter’s (1966) model which covers the “locus of control”[2]. The diagram below gives an indication of the types of beliefs that a patient may have which determine whether their locus of control is internal or external. Of course, patients do not fall simply into one of the two categories, their beliefs may place them anywhere on the scale of the two extremes. 

Locus of Control

Naturally, a more internal locus of control makes it easier for the HCP to engage with the patient as they are more likely to be positive about taking on responsibility and action to make improvements to their own health.  However, patients with a more external locus of control may believe that their condition is out of their control and that nothing they do will make a difference. Patients with these beliefs are far more difficult to engage but it is possible to shift their attitudes, and this is a key goal of the HCP.  

Here are a few ways to help encourage a positive shift:

Engaging patients with their condition can be a hurdle but once overcome the opportunity for patient education is available. Education can support patients to fully understand their individual healthcare situation, so they are well placed to take joint responsibility and make decisions together with their HCP. 

The benefits are two-fold.

Firstly, the patient starts to ‘activate’. As they gain a sense of control and ownership for their condition they are more likely to make positive choices that impact on their health. Patient activation is defined by the National Health Service as “The knowledge, skills and confidence a person has in managing their own health and care.”[3] Patients are motivated because they understand the impact they can have and how their quality of life can be improved. At this point, medication adherence is likely to increase, complications reduce, and patient progress enhance. 

Secondly, the NHS is also set to benefit. Due to better medication adherence, self-management, self-monitoring of their condition and positive lifestyle choices, patient appointments are likely to be fewer as problems are reduced and patient progress enhanced. Improved patient progress reduces cost, time and resources required from the NHS. A study[4] found that less activated patients had 8 percent higher costs in the base year and 21 percent higher costs in the following year than more activated patients. At a time of increasing strain on the NHS, patient activation is more important than ever.

Affecting all three stages; patient engagement, patient education and patient activation are elements highlighted in Hochbaum’s Health Belief Model. [5]

The elements in the model influence the likelihood of the acceptance and application of health behaviours by the patient. The individual’s behaviour depends on the value that he or she places on an outcome and on the individual’s estimate that a particular action will result in that outcome. The HCPs challenge is to engage patients by focusing on outcomes that relate to their personal priorities and circumstances. 

By relating outcomes to the individual, there is an increased chance that patients will be motivated to take action. This requires significant communication skill on the part of the HCP to build an open and trusted relationship with their patients. This relationship can enable not only patient activation but patient participation in the decision-making process around their treatment options, further reducing barriers to non-adherence.

Hochbaum’s Health Belief Model dates back to the 1950’s and Rotter’s Locus of Control, the 1960’s, so it seems that the ideas around patient engagement and education are nothing new. To effectively engage patients with their health and educate them to the point of activation needs time though, something that we often hear HCPs are short of as our health service in the UK is stretched to the limit. Time is not the only barrier though, lack of communication skill is even more of an inhibitor. A human communication approach appropriate for the individual and uses the patient’s language is critical. 

Taking a longer-term view, increased investment of time and quality of communication with patients leads to much less investment in time and resources later down the line, ultimately resulting in overall costs savings. At Cuttsy+Cuttsy we recognise not only the need to better support patients but also the need to better support HCPs, so they can support their patients. We work with pharma and charities to develop communications and support materials to aid the engagement, education and activation of patients throughout their healthcare journeys.


If you would like to find out more email us at:


1. Redmon, B.K. (Ed). (2001). The practice of patient education (9th edition). St. Louis” Mosby. 2. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28
5. Hochbaum, G.M. (1958), Public participation in medical screening programs: A sociopsychological study.PHS Publication No. 572. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.


  Why patient education isn’t simple
PDF File: 511.3 KB

5th June 2018


  Why patient education isn’t simple
PDF File: 511.3 KB



Company Details

Cuttsy + Cuttsy

+44 (0) 1223 967222

Contact Website

Unit 6, The Works
Unity Campus
London Road
CB22 3EE
United Kingdom

Latest content on this profile

Opening up about patient engagement
Read the third blog of the series looking at key barriers to effective patient engagement in pharma
Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Committing time to making meaningful connections - top 5 tips
Read the second blog of the series looking at key barriers to effective patient engagement in pharma
Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Key barriers to effective patient engagement in pharma, and how to fix them: Making engagement processes more patient friendly
In the first of this blog series, Patient Engagement Lead, Philippa Pristerà looks at making engagement processes more patient friendly
Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Cuttsy+Cuttsy awarded Gold accreditation by Investors in People
Healthcare communications agency, Cuttsy+Cuttsy, has been awarded ‘We invest in People, Gold’ from Investors in People.
Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Cuttsy+Cuttsy marks its 10th anniversary with the launch of Cuttsy Cares
Healthcare communications agency, Cuttsy+Cuttsy, has announced the launch of Cuttsy Cares, in celebration of its 10th anniversary.  The agency's charitable programme will deliver up to £10,000 to help improve the quality of life of others.
Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Caroline Benson and Colin Williams to Chair the PM Society from February 2020
For the first time both industry and agencies will be equally represented as the PM Society appoints a joint chair.
Cuttsy + Cuttsy