Please login to the form below

Australian Flu and the dilemma of naming diseases

During the winter of 2017-2018 not a day passed when the Australian flu was not mentioned by the UK press. The British media turned talking about Australian flu into an epidemic in itself. So named because the main flu strain in the UK that winter was the same as in Australia, stigma was created by branding this flu ‘Australian’, with people travelling abroad labelled as disease carriers, and creating negative connections between the name and the country.

Naming diseases after people, places and animals has been common practice throughout the world for centuries, from the more current examples of Swine flu and Lyme disease to 19th century Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Parkinsons. In recent times, the potentially damaging consequences of ‘naming’ infectious diseases have been identified, and in 2015 the World Health Organisation (WHO) introduced its ‘Best Practices for the Naming of New Human Infectious Diseases’, which prohibits eponymously naming diseases. The primary reason for this prohibition is to avoid any negative impacts on ‘trade, travel, tourism or animal welfare, and to avoid causing offence to any cultural, social, national, regional, professional or ethnic groups.’

It seems to me that although the original thought behind naming a disease was to honour and immortalise those who discovered the ailment,  the tradition has also led to many cases of naming gone wrong that have incited conflict and distress. For example, in 2009 Egypt ordered the slaughter of their entire pig population (in excess of 300,000) as a precaution against the spread of swine flu, which devastated many farmers. We now know that the name ‘swine flu’ was misleading, to say the least, making the slaughter a completely unnecessary measure as pigs were not only blameless in instigation but are also unable to pass the disease onto humans. Other examples include the damaging 1980s media branding of AIDS disease as GRID (gay-related immune deficiency) and the immense impact on local tourism for locations where diseases have been discovered such as Hendra, Lyme and Ebola.

Despite the WHO guidance, the naming practice continues, with Australians being the latest to be branded by an illness because of the Australian flu. Perhaps the media, with its appetite for a catchy headline, should take some responsibility.

By Olivia R

13th June 2018



Company Details

Say Communications


Contact Website

Tuition House
27-37 St George's Road, Wimbledon
- None -
SW19 4EU
United Kingdom

Latest content on this profile

The doctor will text you now: Why healthcare providers cannot underestimate the importance of communicating change
Healthcare communication needs to switch from ‘transmit’ to ‘receive’, listening to what patients need and embracing the plethora of communication tools wholeheartedly.
Say Communications
Can tobacco companies really reinvent themselves as healthcare companies?
A surprising move by key player, Phillip Morris, has called attention to the start of a new era for the tobacco industry. But can tobacco companies reinvent themselves as healthcare companies?
Say Communications
Why you should feel optimistic about the future of healthcare
It has been a difficult year to remain hopeful for those working in the healthcare industry, but there are some reasons to remain optimistic.
Say Communications
Stick or twist? The future of HCP engagement
The Covid-19 pandemic forced companies to be more agile and rethink their value offering when engaging with HCPs, but what does the future of HCP engagement look like?
Say Communications
Stick or twist? Looking at the patient experience as we emerge from the COVID pandemic
The pandemic has given us a glimpse (actually, more of a very long look) at an alternative way of receiving healthcare and engaging with the NHS. And that alternative fits in with 21st century life in a much better way for many of us. So are these changes here to stay?
Say Communications
Stick or Twist? Healthcare brands in a (post) COVID-19 world
How have our perceptions of healthcare brands and our purchasing habits changed during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Say Communications