The Patient as Priority: How can effective internal training contribute to improving patient outcomes?
October 8, 2020 |
Hear from OPEN Health’s Briony Frost
Improving patient outcomes is a top priority for every healthcare professional (HCP). In a constantly evolving industry where knowledge, skills, techniques and technologies are frequently updated, continuous internal training for medical affairs professionals is an essential component of supporting positive patient outcomes. The “only way to provide safe, effective and high-quality healthcare” is for all health professionals to “maintain and improve their knowledge and skills throughout their careers.”[1]
Investing in ongoing education for med affairs staff brings obvious benefits. Effective training enables staff to:
- Improve their knowledge of disease totality and the clinical landscape
- Analyse and interpret clinical trial data
- Understand the products, devices and lifestyle management strategies available
- Communicate clearly and succinctly in a variety of ways with other HCPs
But how can we identify effective training for our teams and how can we be sure that it prioritises positive patient outcomes? The answer is to connect the dots between patient outcomes and med affairs teams’ professional practices within and throughout essential internal training programmes too.
This post is the first of a four-part blog series in which OPEN Health explains what these dots are and how they should be connected to maximise your team’s potential to positively impact patient outcomes. We start by exploring how to identify training programme approaches that will help your med affairs professionals support HCPs to make the right choices with their patients.
Identifying effective internal training
Many training providers specialise in either knowledge or skills development programmes. For example, Company X provides training on analysing complex data; separately, Company Y provides training on presentation skills. No matter how good the training provided by Companies X and Y, when knowledge development is divorced from skills development, a learning gap is created, in this case: how does the learner identify the key messages and present them to a healthcare audience, such as internal colleagues, medical practitioners, organisations, regulators and decision- and policy-makers, as well as patient groups.
If learners are left to extrapolate from Company Y’s skills training and adapt it to deliver the knowledge enhancement acquired from Company X, the results will vary depending on expertise, experience, confidence and prior training in each area, as well as how much was learned and retained from the original training programmes. This divergence in professional competencies – how skills are used to apply scientific content knowledge to the real world – may impact the information received by the audience. Impacts here include the loss of valuable knowledge gains, inefficient system usage, frustrated users, dissatisfied patients and potentially poor outcomes, wasted time, reputational damage and reduced financial performance – in addition to the initial money and time put into creating and delivering two separate training programmes.
Instead of training content and skills separately, look for programmes that:
- Engage with learners, as well as the leadership team, ahead of delivery to identify and benchmark specific skills and knowledge gaps within the context of their roles
- Enable learners to develop core content knowledge and relevant skills simultaneously, such as distilling, prioritising and presenting key data succinctly and clearly to appropriate audiences
- Integrate applied learning scenarios, such as case studies, problem-solving activities, simulations, virtual realities and role-play to enable learners to practice making use of their knowledge through their skills
- Provide robust, real-time feedback on practice activities and assessments
- Incorporate robust programme evaluation and training impact measures
- Create materials that have been designed and approved for repurposing, adapting and delivering to other HCPs
Improving patient outcomes
Training that encompasses the above is likely to be more effective (both in terms of cost and learning gain) as well as more efficient. But how can we be sure? We will explore the metrics aspect of this question in more detail in the third instalment of this blog series, but before we can look at the results of evaluations, we have to be sure that the training is designed to meet achievable and measurable outcomes.
While training providers are increasingly shifting towards instructional design methods, it is still fairly commonplace for internal training to be designed to fit around perceived essential scientific content knowledge, not what the learner needs to be able to do with that knowledge after the training is complete. This is not an ideal scenario. What happens, consciously or unconsciously, is that a “content-centred” curriculum is developed[2]:
Figure 1: Adapted from G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design 2005. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/research-a-topic/understanding-by-design-resources.aspx. Accessed 30/09/2020.
Here, content is king: learning activities are built around it, skills are delivered separately or bolted on later, assessments are constructed as an afterthought and what successful outcomes look like is often unclear.
Instead, look for training that is designed with what learners need to be able to do to support positive patient outcomes first. Providers should:
- Analyse your team’s learning needs from the outset
- Identify intended learning outcomes from the outset and map them against learner and company key performance indicators (KPIs)
- Understand and explain how learning outcomes, assessments, learning activities, and content plus skills are connected, and why they should be designed in that order
- Distinguish between need to know, useful to know and nice to know content
- Explain how achievement against the learning outcomes will be measured and evaluated to demonstrate impact on professional performance and, by extension, patient outcomes
Thinking along these lines produces a “learning-centred” curriculum[3]:
Figure 2: Adapted from G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design 2005. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/research-a-topic/understanding-by-design-resources.aspx. Accessed 30/09/2020.
Here, desired results are identified first, followed by a determination of acceptable evidence and finally the planning of learning experiences, instructions and resources required to enable learners to provide evidence that they have met the learning outcomes.[4] Using this model, priorities are easier to determine; learning outcomes, assessments and activities are integrated more effectively; and clarity and consistency support a more accurate construction of course concepts, providing concrete, achievable, measurable outcomes.
A number of other factors, such as the metrics that are used and how learner motivation, engagement, confidence and mental health are supported (which we will discuss in our next instalment), are critical to maximising the success of any training programme. But connecting the dots between patient outcomes and each internal training programme’s intended learning outcomes, and keeping the core aspects of the training programme joined up too, is a great place to start!
[1]“The Importance of Continuous Education in Healthcare,” Health Management 2017;17(2). Available at: https://healthmanagement.org/c/healthmanagement/issuearticle/the-importance-of-continuous-education-in-healthcare. Accessed 30/9/2020.
[2]L.D. Fink, Integrated Course Design 2013. Available at: https://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/IDEA%20Papers/IDEA%20Papers/Idea_Paper_42.pdf.Accessed 30/9/2020.
[3]D. Fink, 2013.
[4]G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design 2005. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/research-a-topic/understanding-by-design-resources.aspx. Accessed 30/09/2020.
If you’d like to know more, keep an eye out for part two of our Connecting the Dots mini-series: What’s in it for me?: How to engage, motivate and support staff with internal training, or get in touch at Jess.Ingram@openhealthgroup.com
This content was provided by OPEN Health
Company Details
Latest Content from OPEN Health
Digital Therapeutics Landscape in Europe
OPEN Health introduce an overview of regulatory and HTA developments for digital therapeutics in Europe focusing on Germany and the UK
OPEN Health’s virtual reflections on the World Orphan Drug Congress US
Another congress attended in this virtual world with learnings gathered and connections made across the rare disease community. It was great to be joined by many colleagues from all our...
A day in the life of the Global Head of Publications
We asked Mina Patel to give us an insight into her role as Global Head of Publications at OPEN Health
Striving to become more patient-centric?
Explore more with OPEN Health
Meet OPEN Health and Pharmerit Experts at the World Orphan Drug Virtual USA Congress
Join OPEN Health and Pharmerit – an OPEN Health Company at the World Orphan Drug Virtual Congress from August 24-27, 2020, as we present:Advanced Therapies Commercial: Tuesday, August 25Succeeding with Star Wars...
OPEN Health at the World Orphan Drug Conference USA
Our Director of Rare Disease, Gavin Jones looks forward to his conversation with Emily Crossle & Betsy Bogard at #WODCUSA2020 !
OPEN Health Medical Communications is awarded Medical Affairs Agency of The Year at the Communiqué Awards 2020
We are delighted to announce that OPEN Health Medical Communications was named Medical Affairs Agency of the Year at the virtual 2020 Communiqué Awards ceremony on 02 July 2020.
Margot Hannah, OPEN Health – A personal perspective of LGBT+ and diversity.
Ditch the Label – it’s just me.
Candice Subero to Lead Global Marketing for OPEN Health
OPEN Health is pleased to announce that Candice Subero has been named Global Marketing Lead, effective June 4, 2020. Candice will oversee strategic communications and marketing efforts across all OPEN...
The RARE Youth Revolution has begun
OPEN Health are proud to support RARE Revolution Magazine who have launched a dedicated RARE youth online platform powering up the voices of the youth rare disease community.